ServicesIndustriesCase StudiesInsightsAboutContactSchedule a Consultation
Home / Services / Cybersecurity Risk & Compliance Assessments

Know exactly where your security program stands before someone else decides for you.

A customer questionnaire, an insurance renewal, a regulator’s letter, or an acquirer’s diligence list — something forced the question. Summit answers it with a fixed-fee, framework-aligned assessment written for the people who have to sign the check, not for a security team you don’t have.

Every security program starts with a clear, honest picture of where you actually stand. Summit delivers structured, framework-aligned assessments that translate technical findings into a prioritized, board-ready plan — not just a binder that sits on a shelf.

What this actually is

Plain English, because the person paying for this usually isn’t a security professional.

An assessment is a structured, evidence-based review of how your organization protects its information — measured against a published framework rather than against opinion. We look at how you grant and remove access, how you configure and patch your systems, how you back up and restore, how you vet vendors, how you’d respond to an incident, and what you’ve written down and can prove.

Then we do the part most reports skip. We translate every finding into business terms: what could plausibly go wrong, what it would cost you, what it costs to fix, and where it sits on a funded, sequenced plan you can actually execute with the people and budget you have.

You end up with three things an executive can use immediately — a defensible picture of current state, a prioritized roadmap with owners and dollar figures, and the documentation to answer the customer, underwriter, regulator, or board member who started all of this.

Summit Cyber Advisors is an advisory practice by design — no products, no resale, no referral commissions. We are paid by you and nobody else, so the roadmap you receive reflects your risk, not a vendor’s quota.

Built for organizations without a security department

The industries Summit serves most.

Financial Services & FinTech

Community banks, credit unions, lenders, and fintech platforms working through GLBA, the FTC Safeguards Rule, FFIEC examiner expectations, and board-level risk reporting.

Private Equity & Portfolio Companies

Standing up a consistent, diligence-ready assessment baseline across portfolio companies, and answering an acquirer’s security questionnaire before it becomes a deal issue.

Healthcare & HealthTech

Multi-site practices, billing companies, and health-tech vendors carrying HIPAA obligations and a stack of signed business associate agreements.

M&A

Security due diligence findings converted into a defensible, framework-aligned assessment either side of a transaction can stand behind.

Professional Services

Law, accounting, and consulting firms holding highly sensitive client data with limited internal security staffing, facing the same vendor questionnaires as their enterprise clients.

High-Growth & Mid-Market Companies

Teams whose first enterprise deal just turned into a SOC 2 requirement, a security questionnaire, and a procurement review nobody budgeted for.

Frameworks we assess against

Most clients carry two or three obligations at once. We map them together so one control satisfies several requirements instead of creating three separate projects.

Customer & market driven

SOC 2 Trust Services CriteriaReadiness for Type I and Type II examinations, control narrative development, and evidence design ahead of your CPA firm’s fieldwork.
SOC 1 (SSAE 18) NewInternal control reporting over financial processes, frequently requested alongside SOC 2 by private equity sponsors and financial statement auditors.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022Information security management system gap review, Annex A applicability, and Statement of Applicability support.
HITRUST CSFScoping and readiness review for organizations whose customers or payors require it.
Customer security questionnairesCAIQ, SIG Lite, and bespoke enterprise diligence packets, answered accurately and consistently.

Regulated data & industry

HIPAA Security, Privacy & Breach Notification RulesIncluding the risk analysis required by 45 CFR §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) and business associate agreement review.
GLBA & the FTC Safeguards RuleWritten information security program, qualified individual designation, and required program elements.
PCI DSS 4.0.1Cardholder data environment scoping, self-assessment questionnaire selection, and gap remediation planning.
FFIEC Guidelines NewIT examination and cybersecurity assessment expectations for banks, credit unions, and non-bank financial institutions.
NYDFS Part 500For Texas firms with licensing or customer footprints in other states.
FERPAStudent record protection for education technology vendors and campus partners.

AI governance

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) NewRisk management for the AI systems your organization builds, buys, or embeds, mapped to the framework’s Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage functions.
ISO/IEC 42001 NewThe first certifiable AI management system standard, for organizations that need to demonstrate structured AI governance to customers, boards, or regulators.

Government & defense

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3Control-by-control assessment, System Security Plan, and Plan of Action and Milestones.
CMMC 2.0 Levels 1 and 2Self-assessment preparation, SPRS scoring support, and readiness ahead of a certified third-party assessment.
TX-RAMP and StateRAMPCertification pathway planning for vendors selling to Texas state agencies and public institutions.
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5Where a contract, grant, or prime contractor specifies the catalog directly.

Texas statutes & general risk baselines

Texas Data Privacy and Security ActTex. Bus. & Com. Code ch. 541 obligations for consumer personal data.
Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection ActTex. Bus. & Com. Code ch. 521 safeguard and breach notification duties.
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0Our default baseline when no specific regulation applies, including the Govern function.
NIST Privacy Framework NewA companion to the Cybersecurity Framework for managing consumer data risk alongside Texas and other state privacy statutes.
CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1Implementation Group 1 and 2 review for organizations that want practical controls before formal compliance.
Cyber insurance underwriting requirementsAssessed against what carriers are actually asking for at application and renewal.

Working under a framework that isn’t on this list — an industry standard, a prime contractor’s flow-down, a parent company’s internal policy, or a single customer’s contract schedule? Bring it. We assess against it directly rather than forcing your obligation into a template.

How the engagement runs

Five phases, fixed fee, fixed timeline. You will always know what week you’re in and what we need from you.

Scope and framework selection

Before a proposal exists, we establish which obligations genuinely apply to you and which do not. Many organizations arrive convinced they need a framework their contracts never actually required — and a few discover they’ve been out of scope on one they did.

No charge — completed during the scoping call and a short follow-up.

Documentation and evidence review

We review what already exists — policies, prior assessments, system inventories, vendor contracts, insurance applications, and incident history — through a secure, access-controlled workspace we provide.

Week 1 — roughly two to four hours of your team’s time.

Interviews and technical walkthrough

Structured sessions with leadership, IT or your managed service provider, and the operational staff who live inside the process — validating what’s written against what actually happens.

Weeks 2–3 — typically four to eight sessions of 45 to 60 minutes.

Analysis, scoring, and risk quantification

Findings are mapped control by control, rated for likelihood and business impact, and assigned an owner, an estimated remediation cost, and a realistic effort level. Where one fix closes gaps across several frameworks, we say so and sequence it first.

Weeks 3–4 — no demand on your team.

Executive readout and roadmap handoff

A live session with your leadership — and your board if you want it there — walking through current state, the findings that matter, and a 12-month funded roadmap. You keep every deliverable, and the underlying workpapers, permanently.

Weeks 4–6, depending on tier — followed by 30 days of questions at no charge.

What you receive

Written to be handed directly to a customer, an underwriter, a board, or an auditor without translation.

Executive summary. Four to six pages your CEO and board will actually read, stating the posture, the top exposures, and the recommended investment.
Control-by-control findings register. Every requirement in scope, its status, the evidence reviewed, and the specific gap.
Risk register. Each risk rated for likelihood and impact, with a treatment decision, an owner, and a review date.
12-month prioritized roadmap. Sequenced initiatives with estimated cost, internal effort, and target completion quarter.
Cross-framework mapping. Where you carry more than one obligation, a single view showing which controls satisfy which frameworks.
Policy gap inventory. Which required documents exist, which are outdated, and which have never been written.
Maturity rating with trend baseline. A defensible score you can re-measure against next year to show progress.
Evidence readiness pack. What an auditor or customer will ask for, where it lives today, and what still has to be produced.
Board-ready slide deck. The whole engagement condensed into a governance presentation, yours to reuse.
Initialad hoc, undocumentedDevelopingwritten, inconsistentDefinedstandardized, ownedManagedmeasured, reviewedOptimizedcontinuously improved

Your rating is issued per control domain, not as a single vanity number. Most organizations engaging us for the first time land between Initial and Developing — that’s normal, and it’s the point of measuring.

Assessment pricing

Fixed fee, quoted before work begins. No hourly meter, no scope-creep invoices, no surprise change orders.

Every engagement is priced from the scoping call and stated in writing in the Statement of Work. If the scope genuinely changes mid-engagement, we tell you before any additional work happens and you decide whether to authorize it.

Security Baseline Assessment

For organizations with no specific regulatory requirement yet, or who need to know their posture before committing to a compliance path.

$5,500Flat fee · 2–3 weeks
  • Assessed against NIST CSF 2.0 or CIS Controls v8.1
  • Up to 75 employees, one primary environment
  • Findings register, risk register, and 12-month roadmap
  • Executive readout, 60 minutes
  • Cyber insurance application readiness review

Most common first engagement

Multi-Framework Assessment

For organizations carrying two or more overlapping obligations who need them reconciled into a single program instead of three parallel projects.

From $19,500Flat fee · 6–8 weeks
  • Two or more frameworks assessed and cross-mapped
  • Larger, multi-site, or multi-entity environments
  • Everything in the Framework Readiness tier
  • Consolidated control set retiring duplicate work
  • Vendor and third-party risk review, up to 15 vendors
  • Two readout sessions: leadership and board

Typical for healthcare, financial services, and PE-backed clients

Tailored and scoped engagements

The three tiers above cover most of what growing companies need, and they exist so you can see real numbers instead of filling out a form to learn a price. They are not a constraint.

A great deal of our work is scoped from scratch, because the trigger was specific: a single acquirer’s diligence checklist, one prime contractor’s security schedule, a payor’s audit letter, a failed insurance renewal, a merger integration, or a board that wants an independent second look at what an existing provider has been reporting. A focused two-week review of a single domain — identity and access, backup and recovery, vendor risk, or incident readiness — is priced separately, usually between $2,800 and $4,500.

Add-on services

ServiceDescriptionFee
Security policy suiteDrafting and tailoring of the core written policy set identified as missing during the assessment$3,500
Written information security programThe formal WISP required under the FTC Safeguards Rule, HIPAA, and several state statutes$2,800
Incident response planPlan with defined roles, severity criteria, escalation paths, and notification decision tree$2,400
Executive tabletop exerciseFacilitated scenario with your leadership team and a written after-action report$2,800
Vendor risk program buildTiering criteria, review cadence, questionnaire set, and vendor inventory$3,000
System Security Plan & POA&MNIST SP 800-171 and CMMC documentation package with SPRS score supportFrom $4,500
Additional vendor reviewsBeyond the count included in your tier$275 each
Board or investor briefingStandalone presentation and live session beyond the included readout$1,500
Remediation advisory retainerMonthly guidance while your team works the roadmap, cancellable after 90 daysFrom $2,500/mo
Re-assessmentMeasured against your original baseline to evidence progress, within 18 months45% of original fee

Commercial terms

  • Fifty percent of the fixed fee is due on execution of the Statement of Work; the balance is due on delivery of the final report. Net 15.
  • Fees include all remote work, the secure evidence workspace, every deliverable, and 30 days of follow-up questions after the readout.
  • Travel within Central Texas is included. On-site work beyond two days, or travel outside the region, is quoted separately and approved in advance.
  • If you engage Summit for ongoing Virtual CISO services within 90 days of the readout, the full assessment fee is credited against your first three monthly retainers.
  • All engagements are performed under our Master Services Agreement and a Statement of Work governed by Texas law, with defined liability limits and confidentiality obligations.
Prices shown are current as of 2026 and apply to engagements scoped in Texas. Organizations above roughly 500 employees, or with complex multi-entity structures, are quoted individually — the tiers above would understate that work, and we’d rather say so upfront.

What this is — and what it isn’t

Stated plainly here because it appears in the contract.

What we deliver

  • An independent, evidence-based evaluation of your security program against published framework requirements.
  • Findings and risk ratings expressed in business terms, with cost and effort estimates leadership can budget against.
  • Readiness preparation so that when a CPA firm, certified assessor, or enterprise customer examines you, the outcome is predictable.
  • Documentation you own outright and can hand to auditors, underwriters, regulators, customers, and your board.
  • A named, senior practitioner doing the work — the same person on the scoping call is the person in your interviews and at your readout.

What we do not do

  • We are not a CPA firm and do not issue SOC reports, ISO certificates, audit opinions, or any attestation. Our role is advisory and preparatory.
  • We are not a law firm. Nothing we deliver is legal advice, and no attorney-client privilege arises from our work.
  • We do not perform penetration testing, exploitation, red teaming, or digital forensic investigation. Where you need them, we help you select and manage a licensed firm.
  • We do not resell software, take referral fees, or accept vendor compensation.
  • We do not guarantee any audit result, certification, insurance outcome, or that you will avoid a breach. Security is probabilistic.

Questions we get on the first call

If yours isn’t here, ask it directly — a scoping conversation costs nothing.

How much of my team’s time will this take?

For the Baseline tier, plan on six to ten hours total across your leadership, IT staff or managed service provider, and one or two operational owners. For a full framework assessment, plan on twelve to twenty hours spread over four to six weeks. We schedule around your calendar and send every question in advance.

We already have an MSP handling security. Do we still need this?

Usually yes, and not because your MSP is doing anything wrong. A managed service provider operates controls; an assessment evaluates whether the right controls exist, whether they cover your actual obligations, and whether the evidence would survive scrutiny. We work alongside your provider, not around them.

Which framework should we start with?

Start with whichever one someone is actually going to hold you to. If a customer contract names SOC 2, start there. If you handle protected health information, HIPAA is not optional. If nothing external is driving it yet, NIST CSF 2.0 gives you real risk reduction now and maps cleanly into formal frameworks later. We settle this during scoping, before you commit to a fee.

Will this assessment satisfy our customer’s security review?

In many cases yes — customers increasingly accept a credible third-party assessment plus a remediation roadmap in place of a full audit report, particularly from smaller vendors. It will not substitute for a SOC 2 report where a contract specifically requires one. Send us the customer’s language during scoping and we’ll tell you honestly which situation you’re in.

What happens if the findings are bad?

They frequently are, on the first pass, and that’s not a reason to avoid measuring. The report is written for constructive use: findings are prioritized so you can show a defensible plan rather than a wall of red. A documented, funded, in-progress roadmap is a far stronger position with regulators, underwriters, and customers than having never looked.

Do you assess frameworks that aren’t listed on this page?

Yes. Contractual security schedules, prime contractor flow-down requirements, parent company standards, and industry-specific baselines all come up regularly. Send us the document that created the obligation and we’ll scope directly against it.

Can you help us fix what you find?

Yes, through a remediation advisory retainer or an ongoing Virtual CISO engagement — and if you move to a Virtual CISO retainer within 90 days, your full assessment fee is credited toward it. We’re equally comfortable handing the roadmap to your internal team or your MSP and stepping back.

How do you protect the information we share with you?

Assessment findings are among the most sensitive documents your organization will produce. Evidence is exchanged only through an encrypted, access-controlled workspace, never by email attachment. We request redacted or sampled data wherever it will do the job, and return or securely destroy your material on request.

About the practice

Texas, specifically

Summit Cyber Advisors is based in Georgetown, serving organizations across the state. Engagements are governed by Texas law.

Senior practitioner delivery

Assessments are performed by an experienced security leader with hands-on ownership of audits, incident response, and executive reporting — not a junior staff or an offshore questionnaire mill.

Insured

Professional liability and errors and omissions, cyber liability, and commercial general liability coverage are maintained throughout every engagement.

Advisory only, by design

No software resale, no managed services, no vendor commissions. Our only revenue from your engagement is the fee you agreed to.

Find out where you actually stand.

This site